Re: More on S. rosea

From: Dave Evans (dpevans@rci.rutgers.edu)
Date: Wed Jun 07 2000 - 19:42:09 PDT

Next message: Miguel de Salas: "In vitro seed culture"
Previous message: Dave Evans: "Re: Pollen"
Maybe in reply to: Barry Meyers-Rice: "More on S. rosea"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2000 22:42:09 -0400
From: "Dave Evans" <dpevans@rci.rutgers.edu>
To: cp@opus.hpl.hp.com
Message-Id: <aabcdefg1741$foo@default>
Subject: Re: More on S. rosea

Dear List,

I rather like Nigel's approach:

----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, February 28, 2000 2:23 PM

> Looks good to me, but the Devil's Advocate might also suggest
> S. purpurea subsp. purpurea var purpurea
> S. purpurea subsp. purpurea var venosa
> S. purpurea subsp. rosea
> which recognises, in order of importance
> 1) the difference between S purpurea and the other Sarries
> 2) the difference between rosea and the other purpureas
> 3) the difference between venosa and purpurea
> (but then how would you recognise the current var montana?)
>

I suppose that it would be accurate like this: S. purpurea subsp.
purpurea var montana.

Dave Evans

Next message: Miguel de Salas: "In vitro seed culture"
Previous message: Dave Evans: "Re: Pollen"
Maybe in reply to: Barry Meyers-Rice: "More on S. rosea"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Jan 02 2001 - 17:35:09 PST