Re: S. purpurea Subspecies

From: Phil Wilson (cp@pwilson.demon.co.uk)
Date: Fri Aug 11 2000 - 05:35:16 PDT


Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2000 13:35:16 +0100
From: Phil Wilson <cp@pwilson.demon.co.uk>
To: cp@opus.hpl.hp.com
Message-Id: <aabcdefg2455$foo@default>
Subject: Re: S. purpurea Subspecies

Dear Jan,
>
>... should only be called such if they are _Nepenthes_ (BTW, this
>species appears to be very rare in cultivation, most cultivated
>plants bearing this name are in fact _N. ventricosa_). _N. burkei_
>was named after BURKE.
>
Which characteristics can be used to differentiate between these two
apparently closely related species (N. burkei and N. ventricosa)?

Regards,
Phil Wilson
Email: cp@pwilson.demon.co.uk



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Jan 02 2001 - 17:35:11 PST