Re: office plants

John Taylor [The Banshee] (s883351@minyos.xx.rmit.OZ.AU)
Tue, 12 Nov 91 11:11:34 +1100

>I grew falconeri not very successfully for a year then it snuffed it.
>I've had petiolaris `Kununurra' for about 1.5 yrs and have done very
>well with it. It is my suspicion this plant does not like terraria
>because the humidity may be too high? Or maybe it is prone to fungus?
>In any event, it does very well in my greenhouse....

Actually, they are in the greenhouse, not in the nepenthes terrarium in the
greenhouse as Paul posted, so it may be OK.

>No one has had luck getting seed yet, unless you cross pollinate. Following
>Allen Lowrie's advice, I have mine in 50/50 peat-perlite. I have mine in a
>deep pot (13 cm), about 2.5 cm in water. I don't know what I'm doing right,
>but the plant is producing new growth crowns at its base. The one in the
>terrarium I had died.

The mix our plants came in definitely contains perlite, so it is quite likely
to be a 50/50 peat/perlite mix - they may actually originate from Alan Lowrie
but I can't be sure of Gardenworld's sources. I even suspect that some of
their plants came from Fred Howell (same mislabelling ;-) )

>From memory (which according to my wife, and despite my claims to the
>contrary, is not infallible) there are
>
>D. falconeri
>D. lanata
>D. dilatato-petiolaris
>D. petiolaris
>D. petiolaris "erect"
>D. petiolaris "medium rosette"
>D. petiolaris "mini rosette"
>D. petiolaris "Kununurra"

Well, that's another two new species I haven't heard of before, not to
mention all the petiolaris forms...

>>but I draw the line when they start smothering my Utrics. Our liverworts
>>have small cup-like growths which hold gemmae or spore-packets, with the
>>usual
>
>I'd like to see this sometime. I've seen photos.

Assuming they're still alive, next time we send you seed I'll try to
send some gemmae (?), so you can have fun weeding 'em out of your Utrics
too!

>Oh, in Jan Schlauer's plant list, he lists D. auriculata as being actually
>D. peltata ssp. auriculata.

Well, until I hear that it has been officially renamed as a subspecies of
peltata, I'm going to continue calling it D. auriculata. (and even then I
may not change the name - there are several differences between them that
should warrant it being a separate species, at least in my book).