> I figure (Mexican _Pinguiculae_)'re *always* wrong. And IDing this group is
>>not a challenge I wish to take.
It's not that bad if you have flowers (and a hand lens, of course).
>I'll stick with the 216 species of _Utrics_, at least those are easy! :)
Did I read "easy"? Hey, you've got an exotic definition of "easy"! 8-)
BTW: Do *you* accept _U.beaugleholei_ (as no. 216), while P.T. doesn't?
>I've got a _P.agnata_ from Tom Johnson. Strange elliptical to almost
>rectangular leaves about 5 cm long. They are prone to being a little
>ratty around the edges (...). Does this _P.agnata_ leave shape mesh with other
>>growers' plants?
Yes, and quite probably you do have the real species. The edges of the
(fleshy) leaves are not upturning as much as in other species, are they?
>Jan, we'll forgive your inexcusable error re: _U. resupinata_ on Cuba.
Thank you so much!
Kind regards
Jan