Re: cryptogams...

Jan Schlauer (zxmsl01@student.uni-tuebingen.de)
Sun, 5 Feb 1995 16:21:35 +0100

Peter,
> these as cryptograms (sic). As the spelling amd the 19th century
> illustration hardly inspire confidence, I guess he is either out of
> date or just plain wrong... or is this part of a lumpers/splitters-
> type disagreement?

The concept is rather out of date (& the spelling is a misprint).

> I'm not quite sure what a 'derived protist' is, but does this
> mean fungal cells are endowed with nucleii?

Fungi should be addressed as an own kingdom derived from protist ancestors
+/- directly without having taken the "plant" way.
They have nuclei (protists have nuclei, too).

Kind regards
Jan