>Ok, I think I was not clear. The names are _Nepenthes xiphoidesi_ Salmon et
>Maulder spec.nov. and _Nepenthes mikei_ Salmon et Maulder spec. nov. In the
>describtion there is a diagnosis in Latin and the entire article is very
>reminiscent of Andreas's article as well as a designation as to where the
>type is located. So they are valid?
Well, I did not know of the publication of these two names. Where did
it appear? If they look like you write, these names are valid. Please
mail me a full reference of the paper (journal, volume, page, year).
Thank you very much.
Kind regards
Jan