I thought I posted the citation... apparently not, apologies.
>However, _N.xiphioides_ seems to be conspecific with _N.gymnamphora_, I'm
>afraid. The mentioned/illustrated differences appear rather weak for
>specific segregation, especially if several populations of _N.gymnamphora_
>from Sumatra or even from the whole range of this species (which does reach
>S Borneo!) are compared.
>
>I am not really happy to see the recently trashed name N.pectinata
>succeeded by a new one like a cut off Hydra's head (BTW, if one considered
>the "pectinate" forms of _N.gymnamphora_ as distinct from the type,
>N.pectinata would have been the appropriate name for these, cf. also the
>lectotype of N.p.!). Seems like taxonomists are not satisfied with only two
>names for the two species _N.singalana_ and _N.gymnamphora_ (cf. etiam
>N.junghuhnii, N.diatas, N.rosulata...).
So, where does N. melamphora fit in? How is it different than N.
gymnamphora?
Christoph