Re: CP Mapping Project
L235@aol.com
Mon, 26 Feb 1996 10:53:45 -0500
In theory, I think mapping CP sites is an excellent idea (see Toby Marsden's
posting in CP digest 633), for just the reasons pointed out. Also the typical
caveats (again, for just the reasons pointed out). As far as the U.S. is
concerned, the locales are (unfortunately) relatively limited for all but the
most ubiquitous of plants, and between us we could certainly identify the
most accessible and enjoyable stands of various species, particularly the SE,
Middle Atlantic, and Pacific Northwest. Perhaps there should be a trusteeship
in charge of the information. The database being compiled by the Nature
Conservancy in the U.S. is one potential model: They map the nation's "last
great places" to identify their purchase and protection strategy. (in the
latest issue of their magazine, they also point out that conservationists
need to do more than just worry about vertebrates). Perhaps the ICPS could
work with the Conservancy for this end, mapping CP sites on private land with
an eye towards conservation. Membership in ICPS or the Conservancy (or both
... like me) might be the gate one needs to prevent unauthorized access to
this valuable information. (assuming of course the membership in both
organizations would instill the spirit of conservation necessary to protect
more fragile sites).
Jay Lechtman
L235@aol.com