To be honest after having monitored the discussion for some days I
still do not understand where the problem is. If you really wants to
find a particular species in the wild you can at least easily find
out most type localities by studying the type description. And that's
exactly how things should be!
Imagine if one would write a protologue and would not give the best
information he/she has. Is this the kind of science you prefer? For
me that sounds a bit like middle ages style...
The consequence would be to limit access to university libraries to
the privilegued who are best in pretending that they are the right
people. Deep dark middle ages........
The same holds true for a mapping project:
I think that science simply has no right to select who will get information
an who will not. Conservation people should do their best to conserve
environments or plants but not information.
Andreas
Andreas Wistuba; Mudauer Ring 227; 68259 Mannheim; Germany
Phone: +49-621-705471 / +49-621-7152027
Fax: +49-621-7152028
E-Mail: andreas.wistuba@rhein-neckar.de
WWW: http://www.rhein-neckar.de/~carnivor/index.html