>> task of mankind to recognize that natural diversity is in itself a
>> value worth of conservation, irrespective of possible future
>> applications (i.e. commercial value) to the benefit of mankind (or at
>> least the selling part of which). This is apparently a very difficult
>> lesson, and human cognition may not be ready to learn it in time.
>
>I certainly agree.
>
>> However, I see no mission for science here if common sense is not
>> sufficient. Those who just go and strip sites of rare or even *all*
>
>Anyone interested in doing conservation should apply some of that interest
>to understanding of principles of conservation. The role of genetics in
>conservation is very important, and not simple. Common sense is not
>sufficient to deduce it. A little learning is required. I'd recommend
>those interested in genetic diversity to please skim over a basic
>biology text if they've not done so in a long time. This will cover basic
>terminology and concepts which I think are necessary before moving on
>to discussing the role of genetic diversity in conservation.
>
>Michael Chamberland
For those that are interested in getting some grasp of what is a truly
complex and awe inspiring subject, one might try:
_THE DIVERSITY OF LIFE_ by Edward O. Wilson
Bleknap Press of Harvard University Press - 1992
It is an eminently good read for not-so-scientific types (like myself) and
a fascinating discussion, which includes many insights into the topic(s)
posted on this list.
Kind Regards
Rand