Date: Sat, 11 Jan 1997 13:59:23 From: SCHLAUER@chemie.uni-wuerzburg.de To: cp@opus.hpl.hp.com Message-Id: <aabcdefg158$foo@default> Subject: Re: N. burkei and N. ventricosa
Dear Meryl,
> If N. ventricosa and N. burkei are the same species why is N.
> ventricosa (Blanco, 1898) considered the correct name, when N.
> burkei (Veitch, 1897) was published first. Please correct me if my
> information is incorrect.
Your information is rather entirely incorrect.
Blanco s Flora Filipin. appeared as early as 1837 (!). Although
_N. burkei_ was described a bit earlier than you have assumed (Gard.
Chron. 3. ser. 6: 492, 1889!) this was still not early enough for
having been published first (v.s.).
Kind regards
Jan
PS: Perhaps you and /or others may want to have a look at the cp
homepage by Rick Walker in order to answer questions like the above
without having to wait for me to do so:
http://www.hpl.hp.com/bot/cp_home
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Jan 02 2001 - 17:30:58 PST