Re: Re: clonal names

From: dave evans (T442119@RUTADMIN.RUTGERS.EDU)
Date: Wed Jul 09 1997 - 17:14:00 PDT

Next message: SCHLAUER@chemie.uni-wuerzburg.de: "Re: Re: clonal names"
Previous message: SCHLAUER@chemie.uni-wuerzburg.de: "Re: clonal names"
Maybe in reply to: SCHLAUER@chemie.uni-wuerzburg.de: "Re: clonal names"
Next in thread: SCHLAUER@chemie.uni-wuerzburg.de: "Re: Re: clonal names"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Date:    Wed, 09 Jul 97 20:14 EDT
From: dave evans                           <T442119@RUTADMIN.RUTGERS.EDU>
To: cp@opus.hpl.hp.com
Message-Id: <aabcdefg2591$foo@default>
Subject: Re: Re: clonal names

Hi Jan,

I have read that a cultivar shouldn't be named unless there are
at least a couple duplicates in more that one collection... But
then any name given would not be valid, nor could it be, since it
hasn't been published and if it's used before being published it can't
be used. (For that clone only or the whole species???) Are there any
guide-lines as to how to keep out of this confusion?

Dave Evans

Next message: SCHLAUER@chemie.uni-wuerzburg.de: "Re: Re: clonal names"
Previous message: SCHLAUER@chemie.uni-wuerzburg.de: "Re: clonal names"
Maybe in reply to: SCHLAUER@chemie.uni-wuerzburg.de: "Re: clonal names"
Next in thread: SCHLAUER@chemie.uni-wuerzburg.de: "Re: Re: clonal names"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Jan 02 2001 - 17:31:05 PST