Date: Wed, 21 Oct 1998 09:23:49 From: SCHLAUER@chemie.uni-wuerzburg.de To: cp@opus.hpl.hp.com Message-Id: <aabcdefg3336$foo@default> Subject: Re: Drosera Hybrids
Dear Peter & al.,
> >D.sessilifolia x burmanii
>
> = D.*thelocalyxiana (fertile!)
= invalid! (nomen nudum)
> >D.anglica x spathulata
>
> = D.*nagamoto
Wrong spelling. The correct name is _D. * nagamotoi_. There is also a
cultivar named _D._ 'Nagamoto'.
> D.spatulata x something = D.*wateri
Wrong spelling. The cultivar is named _D._ 'Watari'. The parentage is
_D.anglica * D. spatulata_.
> D.filiformis ssp.filiformis x filiformis ssp.tracyi =
> D.*'California Sunset' (fertile!)
Not surprising! Many _Drosera_ hybrids are fertile. Only if the
(hybridogenic, allotetraploid) _D. anglica_ is involved, frequently
(not necessarily always) sterile hybrids arise. For more detailed
debates on this topic, please refer to the archives of this
discussion list.
There is also a scientific name for this hybrid (_D. * californica_).
If it is admitted that both parents are varieties of a single
species, the combination _D. filiformis nothovar. californica_
should have been made. This was *not* done by Martin Cheek (who
described the hybrid), however.
> D.nitidula ssp.omissa * D.occidentalis ssp.occidentalis (used to
> be D.'Lake Badgerup')
Validated as _D. * badgerupii_.
> Before Jan starts hopping up and down :)
No chance, the hopping routine has already commenced.
> I'll point out that some of these names have not been
> properly published.
Some of them (v.s.) have in fact been published properly (after +/-
significant corrections of the spelling).
> If you add to the list, I'm sure we'd all love to see a final/more
> complete one. If you'd like a bit of web space to post a page of
> hybrids, let me know.
Just check out http://www.hpl.hp.com/bot/cp_home. No need to invent
the wheel twice.
Kind regards
Jan
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Jan 02 2001 - 17:31:37 PST