Date: Wed, 28 Oct 1998 08:12:07 From: SCHLAUER@chemie.uni-wuerzburg.de To: cp@opus.hpl.hp.com Message-Id: <aabcdefg3420$foo@default> Subject: sub-carnivores
Dear Laurent,
> When you tell to Kamil he features non-carnivorous genera as
> brocchinia or proboscidea, do you mean these genera couldn't be
> considerated as non-carnivorous because only an unique species is
> carnivorous in this genus, or because these specie are still not been
> demonstrated as carnivorous at all ?
We had these discussions several times on this list already. Please
check out the archives.
Apparently none of the bromeliads has endogenous hydrolytic activity
in their "traps". Bromeliads and similar cistern-forming monocots are
adapted at accumulating all sorts of living and dead debris as a
compensation for the missing substrate in their habitats (many are
epiphytic). This is a specialized form of soil generation/
accumulation, not carnivory in the sense we discuss it here. Even the
simplest _Heliamphora_, which may even lack digestive enzymes (but
_H. tatei_ does secrete them!), is dimensions more of an animal trap
than the most elaborate bromeliad.
_Proboscidea_ and _Ibicella_ are perhaps sub-carnivorous. They lack
digestive enzymes but they may have mutualistic symbioses comparable
to the better understood sub-carnivores _Roridula_ and _Byblis_.
Kind regards
Jan
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Jan 02 2001 - 17:31:38 PST