Re: Saccifolium bandeirae

From: Richard Jenkins (r_c_jenkins@hotmail.com)
Date: Fri Apr 16 1999 - 05:50:10 PDT

Next message: schlauer@chemie.uni-wuerzburg.de: "Re: Saccifolium bandeirae"
Previous message: Richard Jenkins: "Pinguicula pachuca"
Next in thread: schlauer@chemie.uni-wuerzburg.de: "Re: Saccifolium bandeirae"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Date: Fri, 16 Apr 1999 05:50:10 PDT
From: "Richard Jenkins" <r_c_jenkins@hotmail.com>
To: cp@opus.hpl.hp.com
Message-Id: <aabcdefg1370$foo@default>
Subject: Re: Saccifolium bandeirae

Dear Jan et al,

>You can also forget all the rest of the text, because recent
>sequencing work (done correctly *this* time) revealed all the
>conclusions in the Harv. Pap. Bot. article to be essentially wrong.

Can you clarify this statement? Which paper is right and which
is wrong? Which species/genes have been sequenced recently?

Richard
Sheffield, UK

Next message: schlauer@chemie.uni-wuerzburg.de: "Re: Saccifolium bandeirae"
Previous message: Richard Jenkins: "Pinguicula pachuca"
Next in thread: schlauer@chemie.uni-wuerzburg.de: "Re: Saccifolium bandeirae"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Jan 02 2001 - 17:31:57 PST