Date: Sat, 18 Dec 1999 16:01:07 From: SCHLAUER@chemie.uni-wuerzburg.de To: cp@opus.hpl.hp.com Message-Id: <aabcdefg4188$foo@default> Subject: Re: IMPRESSIONS FROM the other end
Dear Richard,
> This seems rather strange considering the direction CPN appears to
> be taking as it traverses the portal to the New Millennium.  Don't
> get me wrong I'm all for a gradual mix of all and sundry but I do
> think the News & Views section needs to be beefed-up a bit to the
> level that it used to be in the old "Black & Whites".  Can we have
> a few less "Descriptive" articles and a few more active ones?
Since I feel some responsibility for the contents of CPN (I am a 
coeditor), I think I should share some opinions on these topics.
1. Any journal (not only CPN) can only be as good as the 
contributions submitted for publication. If you want more active 
stuff in CPN, the only remedy is to write such and submit it to 
us. There is *NO* other way. CPN has, unlike many other journals 
these days, the opportunity to devote substantial proportions of 
valuable page space to its news and views section that is not peer-
reviewed. This is the reason why sometimes rather "wild" material 
appears there. However, we trust the mehods featured in news and 
views have at least worked for the authors who submitted them.
2. If you are looking for in-depth information, you must scan the 
articles (=not the news and views section). These papers are 
considered more seriously than news and views submissions, and all 
critical information therein was seen at least by two coeditors. 
Papers considered predominantly scientific or at least "serious" in 
content are sent to anonymous peer reviewers for a critical check. 
3. The editorial team of CPN is always appreciative of constructive 
criticism, and we will try to improve CPN where we can. If you have 
an idea how authors could be incited to submit "active" rather than 
"descriptive" texts for news and views, please specify.
Kind regards
Jan
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Jan 02 2001 - 17:32:09 PST