Re: Re: ?D.peltata?

From: SCHLAUER@chemie.uni-wuerzburg.de
Date: Tue Jan 07 1997 - 07:59:43 PST

Next message: SCHLAUER@chemie.uni-wuerzburg.de: "Re:Drosophyllum"
Previous message: Aaron Hicks: "Nitrogen uptake"
Maybe in reply to: SCHLAUER@chemie.uni-wuerzburg.de: "Re: ?D.peltata?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Date:          Tue, 7 Jan 1997 07:59:43 
From: SCHLAUER@chemie.uni-wuerzburg.de
To: cp@opus.hpl.hp.com
Message-Id: <aabcdefg96$foo@default>
Subject:       Re: Re: ?D.peltata?

Dear Phil,

> Regarding the differences between D. auriculata and D. peltata I would
> agree that sepal difference (glabrous D. auriculata, hairy D.
> peltata) is consistent.

So *please* read the Conn paper to believe the opposite.

Kind regards
Jan

Next message: SCHLAUER@chemie.uni-wuerzburg.de: "Re:Drosophyllum"
Previous message: Aaron Hicks: "Nitrogen uptake"
Maybe in reply to: SCHLAUER@chemie.uni-wuerzburg.de: "Re: ?D.peltata?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Jan 02 2001 - 17:30:58 PST