Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1999 11:37:21 PST From: "Fernando Rivadavia Lopes" <fe_rivadavia@hotmail.com> To: cp@opus.hpl.hp.com Message-Id: <aabcdefg264$foo@default> Subject: Re: Drosera sessilifolia
To Matt and Jan,
>Without a flower, I guess no human being will be able to tell these 
>two species apart (if they are not labeled, of course).
           Well Jan, there is at least one human capable of telling them 
apart without flowers: ME! And I believe my good friend Ivan Snyder in 
L.A. (the one who hybridized both species) may be even better than 
myself, since he has to tell them apart in cultivation, when  
D.sessilifolia is usually rather small and puny for some reason.
            It's true they are VERY similar species, but they're not too 
hard to differentiate in cultivation when you have the common form of 
D.burmannii. I've seen some odd forms of D.burmannii from N Australia 
which had quite weird leaf shapes and very red leaves. These may be a 
bit more confusing. Basically, the leaves of D.burmannii are more 
triangular and those of D.sessilifolia more rounded. The leaves (or 
tentacles) of the latter are also usually more reddish or pinkish. If 
they flower, you'll see erect scapes with pink flowers on D.sessilifolia 
and ascending scapes with white flowers in D.burmannii (although I've 
seen forms of this species with erect scapes and I think I've at least 
heard of pink flowered specimens too).
            Having just seen D.sessilifolia in the wild again, I've 
gained a few new insights into this curious species, or at least 
hypothesis. Me and a few others have noticed that in cultivation 
D.sessilifolia is always a miniature of what the parent plants looked 
like in the wild, never growing very large. When I found them N of Boa 
Vista last week, I noticed they were growing only in a small area near a 
road, where there were some houses, and where horses and cows 
occasionally passed by. Yet while exploring further away along the 
river, Gert and I could find no signs of D.sessilifolia, although there 
were apparently many good habitats. 
            So what is going through my mind at the moment is that 
D.sessilifolia may need some kind of fertilizer to grow, both in the 
wild (from animal droppings) and in cultivation. It would be interesting 
to test this in cultivation, adding different types of fertilizer to see 
how big the plants get. If it is true tha D.sessilifolia likes areas 
fertilized by animal droppings, then we can speculate that 
D.sessilifolia was VERY common until a few thousand years ago, back 
before the natives dined on the last mammoths, giant ground sloths, and 
other extinct S.American megafauna species.  :):)
Best Wishes,
Fernando Rivadavia
Sao Paulo, Brazil
P.S.   I'll get in touch with you soon Matt, just let me get a bit more 
organized here!
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Jan 02 2001 - 17:31:54 PST